The Highway Forums General Discussion Theology Discussion Forum Sola Scriptura

No offense... really, I don't intend to make light of your statement-question, but don't you think it is rather self-contradictory? I mean you reject "Sola Scriptura" (grounds not provided) which is the doctrine that says the inspired, infallible and inerrant written Word of God, the Bible, is the sole and final authority in all matters of faith and practice. But, then you ask for verses from the very source which you reject as being ultimately authoritative.

Now, I would like to ask this very sincere question of you... What is your purpose in asking about "Sola Scriptura"? Is it because you enjoy debating with Protestants on this and other issues which are contrary to Rome's doctrines/practices? Or, are you questioning the position of the Roman State Church and thus are wanting answers? If the former, then personally, I don't have the time to enter into fruitless debates. If the latter, then I will certainly make the time to try and provide biblical, rational and historical arguments for the doctrine. Doubtless, the others here would be in agreement as well re: spending time.

For a brief defense of the doctrine of Sola Scriptura see here:

1. The Authority of Scripture, by William Webster
2. Sola Scriptura and the Church, by William Webster
3. The Authority of Scripture, by John Armstrong
4. The Authority of Scripture, by Paul Cook
5. What Do We Mean by Sola Scriptura?, by Robert Godfrey

For a definitive defense of Sola Scriptura, I would point you to the 3-volume work by William Webster and David King (I have an inkling you know about this set already. ), Sola Scriptura [Book Review].