|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,464
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
#5160
Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:43 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615 |
Well since others beat me to the punch and already revealed your error I am only left with your little tid-bit here:<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Grace is unmerited favor. It remains grace if a man refuses to receive it. It remains grace if a man decides to receive it. Your theology fails to understand that basic truth. You would contend that grace stops being grace if a man has a choice to receive it or not. Totally untrue.</font><hr></blockquote><p><ul> 1. How can DEAD unregenerate men receive anything, they are dead to God, they can not receive anything from him. P.S. before you TELL me they are NOT dead:<br><br>The Greek word for [color:blue]dead</font color=blue> in Eph 2:1 is [color:blue]nekros</font color=blue> meaning [color:blue]dead</font color=blue> or [color:blue]without life</font color=blue> (Kittle, it is also used in other verses of man’s state: Matt. 8:22; John 5:25; Eph. 2:5; 5:14; Phil. 3:11; Col. 2:13; cf. Luke 15:24). If there would have been a “spark of life,” Paul could have used another term such as [color:blue]hemithanes</font color=blue> meaning “half-dead” (used in Luke 10:30). Apparently, Paul under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit chose the term that best fit the state—that of being DEAD, without life, to God, and [color:red]not</font color=red> half-dead as you contend. Thus, your argument is against Scripture not me or other Calvinists? You wrestle with the Scripture (2 Pet 3:16).<br><br>2. I contend, not that Grace ever ceases to be grace, but ONLY that grace is offered effectually to the elect. <br><br>3. Where have I said that EVERY man is offered effectual GRACE?--this is your contention not mine!<br><br>4. Your theology fails to understand these basic truths[/LIST]
Reformed and Always Reforming,
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 2:52 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:13 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:38 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:01 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Tom
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 4:03 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:50 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Paul_S
|
Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:14 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:11 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Paul_S
|
Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:25 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
carlos
|
Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:01 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:49 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 8:40 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
carlos
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:49 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:07 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:39 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 2:00 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 2:17 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:17 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:59 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 2:26 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:35 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:06 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Tom
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:00 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:22 PM
|
Jesus said: With man this is impossible
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:50 PM
|
Re: Jesus said: With man this is impossible
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:03 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 2:43 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
carlos
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:59 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
carlos
|
Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:25 PM
|
Nice Story, but???
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun Sep 07, 2003 7:27 PM
|
Re: Nice Story, but???
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 1:15 AM
|
Re: Nice Story, but???
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 1:58 AM
|
Re: Nice Story, but???
|
bishop3
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:21 AM
|
Criley: no longer here
|
carlos
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 9:39 PM
|
Re: Criley: no longer here
|
bishop3
|
Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:59 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:29 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:07 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
bishop3
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:27 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:48 AM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:34 PM
|
Re: The use of "all"
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:06 PM
|
Pick up all your clothes...socks...etc.
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:40 PM
|
Re: Pick up all your clothes...socks...etc.
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Dec 22, 2003 3:52 PM
|
Re: Pick up all your clothes...socks...etc.
|
Anonymous
|
Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:30 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
152
guests, and
78
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|