|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,467
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,378
Posts56,578
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#1826
Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1 |
Will someone please explain the differences between the two. What confuses me is the term Biblical Theology, is it a misnomer. <br><br>For instance, I believe that the WCF (Westminister Confession of Faith) is a system of doctrine that best explains the Bible; therefore is called systematic (theology), but even the WCF subjects itself to the infallibility of Scripture. So, when I hear the term, Biblical Theology, I immediately view it as being the standard. However, when I read discussions over the two ways (don't really know the correct term), I side with the Systematic Theology point in the debate. Am I really disagreeing with Scripture? If the answer is no, then whoever coins these terms, should choose a more descriptive term. <br><br>(I went 5 pages deep to see if the topic has been discussed before; it is not in any of the headings) <br><br>John Chaney <br><br>
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
411
guests, and
13
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|