No need to apologize or keep quiet, the only thing I wanted to understand was the context of the remark, which indeed goes further than a simple lexical definition. If you want to understand the linguistic support for his interpretation, I think the best thing to do would be to read a few pages from this link to No Other Standard. Go to page 317 (which is HTML page 321 in the window to the left) and read his section on the fulfillment of the law in Matthew 5:17.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>~Jason<br>