<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]The document, however, does make such working together one of it's goals and thus promotes MORE than JUST DIALOGING, now doesn't it? Therefore to present the document as one that promotes dialogue only is not the whole truth it would seem.</font><hr></blockquote><p>Self-inflicted blindness is a terrible thing and one which you apparently are engaging in. Why? because from your response here, it seems you didn't read what I actually wrote?? [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/rolleyes.gif" alt="rolleyes" title="rolleyes[/img] I say again, I personally would not sign a document like ECT and I cannot approve of anyone else's signing of it, who claims to be a believer and more so who professes Calvinism. I have clearly made a distinction between "signing ECT" and entering into serious dialog/debate with Roman Catholic apologists. I hope this gets past your blinders this time.<br><br>Again.. your assessment of "throwing stones" as being presenting the truth in Christian love, etc. is erroneous, IMHO. Sometimes one can be so heavenly minded as to be of no earthly good. Beware brother that you don't end up like this: [Linked Image] And as a reminder, Elijah was a man of like passions but he erred in a similar manner and had to be chastised by God and driven out of his cave where he thought he was the only purveyor of the truth. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink[/img]<br><br>In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]