I have to admit that Malone's book confused me at several points. He uses Covenant language and is dogmatic about proclaiming his covenant theology but his interpretation is a unique blending of covenant and dispensational theology.
I have the book highlighted but I will not have access to it for a week or so. I feel bad making the statement without the documentation to back it up but perhaps someone else noticed the same issue.
One think I do remember, and it's what caused me to be on the alert. He mentioned the PCA position on families and their covenant children early in his book. He suggested that their hard line was one reason he couldn't accept the PCA teaching on baptism. The only problem is that he quoted from the first Book of Church Order that the PCA ever had. It has undergone a number of revisions since then and the paragraph he quoted is not even recognizable anymore. That misrepresentation had to be either intentional or completely misinformed. I could have understood if he stated it as a historic position but he presented it as if it were the current views.
Blessings,
M Cannon
http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/titles/1597810096.htm