Hi Steve

Although I am in agreement with you about Baptist CT not being dispensational, I think you are being a little bit over sensitive in this matter.
Apparently I have told you something to that effect before, you can see that here and also from another Baptist (Prestor John ) who holds to CT here
If you look at that thread, you will see neither Prestor John nor I were offended.
Believe me when I say this, I know J_Edwards and he didn’t use “dispensational” as a slam. He just believes that if there is some discontinuity between the Covenants, then it is dispensational, in one way or another.
Can you honestly say that you used the word "Hyper-covenantal" in a way that wasn't meant to be a slam?
If you had used "Hyper-covenantal" in a way that was not meant as a slam, I don't really think there would be a problem, other than perhaps him disagreeing with you.

Tom