<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]The problem in interpreting Rev 20, if you embrace the unbiblical teachings of Dispensationalism first, is that everything else becomes tainted.</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>And everything is NOT tainted if you are a covenantalist? Please. You are correct as always, the issue is hermeneutics, but you have yet to make a compelling case why your particular green glasses are the correct ones to wear. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/thinks.gif" alt="thinks" title="thinks[/img]<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]I am not Post Mil!</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>Why Not?<br>Postmills can argue just like you that Amills are incompatible with Calvinism because it is a defeatist eschatology that limits the power of God's sovereignty to subdue the world.<br><br>Fred

"Ah, sitting - the great leveler of men. From the mightest of pharaohs to the lowest of peasants, who doesn't enjoy a good sit?" M. Burns