Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#2642
Mon May 12, 2003 9:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
|
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615 |
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Nothing in the Bible says that the tribulation will, necessarily, start [color:red] immediately after the Rapture</font color=red>. No one knows how much time will pass.</font><hr></blockquote><p>Now the "raptured" saints will be in Heaven 7 years after the Pre-Mil Rapture, so where are they go if the Tribulation does not begin immediately? Let us say the tribulation begins two years after the Rapture. Where are these raptured saints for those two last years of the Tribulation--for they may only be in Heaven for 7 years, but now we have 9 years?<br><br>Amillennialists believe that the millennium of Revelation 20 is not exclusively future but is now in process of realization. Thus, the tribulation will not begin after the Rapture. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]The Rapture is not the Second Coming. There is only one Second Coming. In the events of the Rapture, Christ comes into the atmosphere. As I said before, He does not actually touch down on earth.</font><hr></blockquote><p> Instead of the Greek terms used in describing the Second Coming indicating two separate events, we find that these terms are used interchangeably in such a way that they show there is but ONE Second Coming of Christ — not two!<br><br>The following is a list of six words that are used to describe the Second Coming of Christ and the shades of meaning they present:<br><br><ul>PAROUSIA. This word stresses the actual personal presence of one who comes and arrives. It is used in James 5:7: “Be patient . . . unto the coming of the Lord”, etc. <br><br>APOKALUPSIS. This word stresses appearing, revelation. It is used in 2 Thess. 1:7: “The Lord shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels”, etc. <br><br>EPIPHANEIA. This word means manifestation and speaks of the glory that will attend Christ when he comes. It is used in 1 Tim. 6:14: “The appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ”, etc. <br><br>PHANEROO. This word means to render apparent. It is used in 1 John 3:2: “When he shall appear, we shall be like him.” <br><br>ERCHOMAI. This word indicates the act of coming, to come from one place to another. It is used in Luke 19:13: “Occupy till I come,” etc. <br><br>HEKO. This word stresses the point of arrival, as I am come and am here. It is used in Rev. 2:25: “Hold fast till I come.” [/LIST] The first word on our list, parousia, is the one most commonly used in reference to the Lord’s coming. The word stresses the actual personal presence of one that has come and arrived. There is nothing in this word to convey the idea of secrecy. Paul, for example, was comforted by the “coming [parousia] of Titus” who brought word to him from the Corinthian Christians (2 Cor. 7:6). Likewise, he spoke of the “coming [parousia] of Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus” (1 Cor. 16:17). In writing to the Philippians, Paul said he would be “coming [parousia]” to see them again (Phil. 1:26).<br><br>Paul used this word in the noted “rapture” chapter which speaks of “the coming [parousia] of the Lord” when the dead in Christ will be raised and believers will be caught up to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thess. 4:15-17). But was the parousia to be a pre-tribulation coming? No! Turning to Paul’s second letter to the Thessalonian believers, Paul again wrote about “the coming [parousia] of our Lord” and “our gathering together unto him” (2 Thess. 2:1). Here he explained that the “parousia” will not take place until AFTER the man of sin is revealed and has carried out his evil work: “The Lord shall destroy [the man of sin] with the brightness of his coming [parousia]” (2 Thess. 2:8).<br><br>According to this, the coming (parousia) of the Lord, the resurrection, and the rapture will come AFTER the reign of the man of sin! — not before.<br><br>In 2 Peter 3, we find more proof that the “parousia” is not a secret coming that will take place BEFORE our Lord’s coming in flaming fire and glory. According to Peter, “the promise of his coming [parousia]” will be fulfilled when “the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat” (2 Peter 3:4-10). And in view of this, Christians are exhorted to be “looking for . . . the coming [parousia] of the thy of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat” (verses 11, 12). The word “parousia” in these places obviously cannot refer to a secret rapture seven years before the end.<br><br>Instead of the RAPTURE being a secret and invisible coming to be followed later by the REVELATION, an open and visible coming, the scriptures show that the rapture and the revelation are one and the same event — not two.<br><br>The word that is translated “revelation” in connection with Christ’s return is apokalupsis which stresses appearing, revelation. Notice its use in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10: “The Lord Jesus shall be REVEALED [apokalupsis] from heaven with his mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God . . . when he shall come to be glorified in his saints.” According to this, the time when Christ is REVEALED in flaming fire is also the time when he comes to be glorified in his saints. If the rapture had taken place seven years before this, the saints would have already been glorified!<br><br>Peter also spoke of the revelation of Christ in 1 Peter 1:13: “Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the REVELATION [apokalupsis] of Jesus Christ.” Again, it is evident that the rapture is not an earlier event to take place seven years before the “revelation.” If this had been the case, these instructions about being sober and hoping until the REVELATION of Christ would be meaningless. It would not be necessary for believers to hope to the end for the grace to be brought to them at the REVELATION of Christ, if — in reality — this grace was to be brought to them at a separate rapture seven years before!<br><br>Likewise in verse 7, Peter spoke of Christians as being “found unto praise and honour and glory at the APPEARING [the revelation, same word, apokalupsis] of Jesus Christ.” But according to the secret rapture position, Christians will have already been taken to heaven and judged before the REVELATION! This is not what the Bible says. Christians are pointed to the appearing or REVELATION of Christ, a fact which clearly indicates that the rapture is the revelation!<br><br>The same word that is translated “revelation” and “appearing” (apokalupsis) in the texts we have noticed, is used in 1 Cor. 1:7 which speaks of Christians as “waiting for the coming [apokalupsis] of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Again it is apparent that the gathering of believers (the rapture) is not something that precedes the revelation of Christ. Why would Christians be waiting for the “revelation” if the “rapture” comes seven years sooner?<br><br>We learn from these verses that the apokalupsis — the REVELATION — is when Christians will be gathered; this is when they meet the Lord; this is the day for which they are waiting. The rapture is NOT one event and the revelation a different event. Instead of two phases being “clearly distinguished in the Greek” by the terms parousia and apokalupsis, a study of these words and the context in which they are used reveals no such distinction whatsoever. To the contrary, both are used in a way that points us to ONE event, the Second Coming of Christ at the end of the age!<br><br>Another word used in describing the return of Christ is EPIPHANEIA, meaning “manifestation” and the glory that will attend our Lord when he comes. This word is not applied to a “secret”, pre-tribulation coming, for Christ will slay the man of sin “with the BRIGHTNESS [epiphaneia] of his coming” (2 Thess.2 :8).<br><br>Bearing this in mind, let us look at 1 Timothy 6:14, 15 in which this same word appears: “. . . keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until THE APPEARING (epiphaneia) of our Lord Jesus Christ: which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords.”<br><br>Now we ask: why would Christians be exhorted to keep the commandment until the “epiphaneia” — the glorious appearing — if seven years before this there was to be a hidden, secret coming to take the church out of the world? The epiphaneia is when the man of sin is slain, it is when Christ comes in open glory and power, and it is until this time that Christians are exhorted to remain faithful. Such instructions would be completely out of place if Christians were to be raptured several years before the epiphaneia.<br><br>The fourth word on our list is PHANEROO, meaning “to render apparent”, which also refers to Christ’s coming in open power and glory. “When the chief Shepherd shall APPEAR [phaneroo], ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away” (1 Peter 5:4). This verse does not say that when the chief shepherd shall appear — be rendered apparent — that Christians will have already been raptured and crowned! No, the rewarding is when Christ shall APPEAR, and not at a supposed invisible coming seven years before!<br><br>John, like Peter, makes the same point: “We know that, when he shall APPEAR (phaneroo), we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.” (1 John 3:2). As Christians it is when Christ shall come and appear — be rendered apparent — that we shall be like him, not at a supposed invisible coming.<br><br>Instead of the Greek terms indicating two second comings, just the opposite is the case. This should be carefully noted. We know that the “parousia” is the same event as the “apokalupsis” (revelation), not only by the actual context in which these words are used (as we have seen), but by the way they are used interchangeably.<br><br>In Matthew 24:37, for example, we read: “But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the COMING [parousia] of the son of man be.” Luke’s account of the same passage says: “As it was in the days of Noah . . . even thus shall it be in the day when the son of man is REVEALED (apokalupsis)” (Lk. 17:26,30). This shows us that the coming (parousia) of Christ and the revelation (apokalupsis) of Christ are the same event!<br><br>Looking to Matthew 24 again, we find that “parousia” is used to describe the same event as “erchomai.” “But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the COMING (parousia) of the son of man be . . . Therefore be ye also ready; for in such an hour as ye think not the son of man COMETH (erchomai)” (Mt.24:37, 44).<br><br>“Erchomai”, in turn, is used to describe the same event as “heko”, for in Hebrews 10:37, we read: “For yet a little while, and he that shall COME [erchomai] will COME [heko], and will not tarry.”<br><br>“Heko” and “parousia” are used together by Peter. In answer to the question: “Where is the promise of his COMING (parousia]?”, Peter answers: “The day of the Lord will COME [heko] as a thief in the night” (2 Peter 3:10).<br><br>The word “parousia” and “epiphaneia” are linked together in 2 Thess. 2:8 in which we read that the man of sin will be destroyed by the “BRIGHTNESS” (epiphaneia) of Christ’s “COMING” (parousia).<br><br>And finally, we notice that the “parousia” is also the “phaneroo”, for both expressions are used in the same verse, referring to the same event: “And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall APPEAR [phaneroo], we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his COMING [parousia].”<br><br>Thus we see that all of these Greek words are used interchangeably. As in English, the different words present varied shades of meaning. But trying to split the Second Coming of Christ into two “stages” or “comings” on a supposed distinction in these Greek terms is completely artificial.<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]During the tribulation, after the church has left the earth, anyone with eyes should be able to see that the tribulation is upon them, and then be able to start counting down, It will be that bad. But, 2 Thes. 2:11 says: And for this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they might believe what is false. This deluding influence will no doubt prevent that.</font><hr></blockquote><p> So does this mean they will not be able to understand a calender--7 years. Is not strong delusion already here: LDS, JW, New Age, Zoroastrainism, Gnosticism, et. al.<br><br>Again and again, there are numerous discrepancies within the dispensational/pre-mil position. Read the article posted by Pilgrim.-- The Rapture. It will be worth your time and show you even more errors than what we have already discussed. We have actually barely scratched the surface of discrepancies within Despie-ville. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/grin.gif" alt="grin" title="grin[/img]
Reformed and Always Reforming,
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 08, 2003 2:31 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
gotribe
|
Thu May 08, 2003 8:32 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 1:01 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 08, 2003 11:15 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 08, 2003 11:49 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 09, 2003 12:18 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 1:22 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:06 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:40 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 09, 2003 11:36 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 2:23 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat May 10, 2003 12:54 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 6:45 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 9:33 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 10:07 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 10:29 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:05 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:32 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon May 12, 2003 12:43 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 12:54 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 3:19 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon May 12, 2003 4:11 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 5:43 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:06 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 3:27 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat May 10, 2003 11:25 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
carlos
|
Mon May 12, 2003 6:58 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon May 12, 2003 7:06 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 9:46 PM
|
Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 9:54 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 10:25 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:20 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Mon May 12, 2003 10:26 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 10:44 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:31 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 11:52 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 12:02 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 12:34 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Tue May 13, 2003 12:54 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Wes
|
Tue May 13, 2003 12:55 AM
|
Earth, Heaven, or ?
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:07 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:46 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:59 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:01 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:11 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:39 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:56 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:06 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:23 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:01 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Tue May 13, 2003 12:31 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:19 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:27 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 9:25 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Tue May 13, 2003 9:38 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Wed May 14, 2003 5:41 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed May 14, 2003 12:10 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Wed May 14, 2003 11:41 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 15, 2003 8:17 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 15, 2003 10:44 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 15, 2003 3:54 PM
|
Assent vs. Faith?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu May 15, 2003 9:24 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Wed May 14, 2003 11:16 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Wed May 14, 2003 10:38 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 15, 2003 8:50 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Thu May 15, 2003 3:49 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Thu May 15, 2003 9:07 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Wed May 14, 2003 3:56 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Thu May 15, 2003 5:48 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
carlos
|
Thu May 15, 2003 3:34 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:30 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 1:57 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:04 AM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:19 AM
|
Re: Reformed Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:25 AM
|
Re: Reformed Literature
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:52 AM
|
So Many Books, so Little Time
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 9:48 AM
|
Re: Reformed Literature
|
RefDoc
|
Tue May 13, 2003 8:12 PM
|
Re: Reformed Literature
|
J_Edwards
|
Tue May 13, 2003 8:15 PM
|
Re: Dispensational Literature
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue May 13, 2003 2:28 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:08 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 3:05 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
fredman
|
Fri May 09, 2003 12:15 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
li0scc0
|
Fri May 09, 2003 12:22 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 09, 2003 12:46 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
fredman
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:40 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri May 09, 2003 4:10 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 1:06 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat May 10, 2003 1:23 AM
|
See I told ya!
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 1:30 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 4:53 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 5:47 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat May 10, 2003 10:40 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:22 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
li0scc0
|
Fri May 09, 2003 2:34 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
li0scc0
|
Thu May 08, 2003 11:17 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 3:07 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 3:52 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 12:53 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 1:49 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 2:22 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sat May 10, 2003 3:40 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sun May 11, 2003 2:22 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun May 11, 2003 2:32 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sun May 11, 2003 3:59 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun May 11, 2003 2:03 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Sun May 11, 2003 9:23 PM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 12, 2003 4:52 AM
|
Re: Are Calvinism and Premillennialism Incompatible?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 09, 2003 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
219
guests, and
34
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|