Quote
J_Edwards said:
Quote
Speratus surmises;Fourthly. The true witness of Warfield, "I may receive pardon for my sins and be accepted as righteous in God's sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to me and received by faith alone" can not be isolated from the errors that occur before and after.
Is there another way to be pardoned from sin? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bash.gif" alt="" />

No. In many places, as here, Warfield retains the doctrine of forensic justification. However, in other places, Warfield speaks as though faith was required as a condition of salvation, as if a person were righteous in the sight of God and saved, not by faith, but on account of his faith, for the sake of his faith, and in view of his faith.

I doubt that Warfield actually believed that man is justified through works of faith that precede and follow the imputation of Christ's righteousness. However, his errors of expression have spread widely throughout the Reform Church. In this case, the Presbyterian system failed since he was apparently never admonished concerning these errors.