Quote
Pilgrim said:
Quote
speratus said:
The Paedobaptist Reform see a command but, contrary to the command they see, they do not baptize a dying infant even when it would cause no harm to the mother or the child, water is present, and there is a believing father to perform the baptism. Why?
Because baptism doesn't save. There is no efficacy in baptism. Biblical Calvinists find no warrant for sarcedotalism in the Bible.

But what does the efficacy in baptism have to do with the command to baptize? Biblical Lutherans baptize their children solely upon the command to baptize not upon the efficacy. The practices of both groups should be the same.