Quote
One reason for me being adament, is because the true gospel has been substituted by a false gospel. The true gospel, look up the word and etomolgy of the word, it's premise is based on a promise titus 1Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ for the faith of God's elect and the knowledge of the truth that leads to godliness— 2a faith and knowledge resting on the hope of eternal life, which God, who does not lie, promised before the beginning of time,
This is the very same error you are reading into the text of 1 Cor 15. You are looking at the term gospel in 1 Cor 15 and assuming Paul is speaking about the WHOLE gospel. However, he makes it perfectly clear that this is not what he is doing, nor is it his intent (1 Cor 15:3). Thus, you have substituted the definition of the complete gospel (which no one is arguing with you about its definition, yet) for Paul’s partial “use of the term gospel” in 1 Cor 15 (which we are discussing—because you are using it out of context) .

We perfectly understand that there is a false gospel in the churches today. We have spoken of it several times here. However, when you are attempting to do apologetics it pays to use verses in context—which you are failing to do.

Since you addressed the remainder of your post to Pilgrim, I will allow him to address it as he may. However, I will say it may do you much good to get to know us first before you begin casting stones.

Reformed and Always Reforming,