This thread has totally been hijacked crazyeyes

Originally Posted by Pilgrim
Baptism now saves as the flood waters saved Noah. Peter uses the word antitupon, i.e., anti-type. God assuredly saved Noah using the ark and the water as means to that end. The water saved Noah and his family in this way. But the water didn't save Noah in and of itself. Likewise, Peter's point is that believers are not to be deceived by following the wickedness of the world as did those in the days of Noah, but rather to rest in the resurrection of Christ, of which baptism signifies and seals to all who HAVE BEEN SAVED by faith in Him. Notice that Peter speaks of a "good conscience", i.e., a conscience which is at peace knowing that salvation is in Christ whom God raised from the dead.

Please explain your point further... Are you saying that [water] baptism is the anti-type of the flood waters saving Noah or vice versa?

Last edited by Peytonator; Tue May 03, 2011 8:59 AM.