Originally Posted by Cranmer
What question was that? Am I a Supralapsarian? Yes, I am. But since when is Supralapsarianism a heresy? The fact is Arminianism is a heresy, not Supralapsarianism.
Who said Supralapsarianism is a heresy?

Originally Posted by Cranmer
The Canons of Dort do not condemn supralapsarianism. They condemn Arminianism:)
True, but again, who said that the Canons of Dordt condemn Supralapsarianism?

Originally Posted by Cranmer
While it is true that the Westminster Confession leans toward infralapsarianism, it is also true that the WCF allows for supralapsarianism, particularly in the chapter on God's decrees.
The majority of the framers of the WCF held to Infralapsarianism but did not openly condemn Supralapsarianism. The Confession is written in such a way as to 'allow' the Supralapsarian view.

Originally Posted by Cranmer
I'm always amused when Baptists accuse Calvinists of being "hyper" Calvinists. That's because such accusations are usually a smoke screen for semi-Arminianism.
No one here has professed to be a Baptist and accused Calvinists of being "hyper" Calvinists. Perhaps you have confused this place with some other venue? scratch1

In short, everything you have written above is irrelevant to this thread and thus a total waste of everyone's time. igiveup

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]